Are You Sure You Want to be a Director?

Thursday, September 4, 2008 by Janice Wilken

The Indiana Supreme Court, in November 2007, decided a case which could impose significant new responsibilities on corporate directors.  In Lean v. Reed, the court found a director of a Canadian corporation personally liable as a matter of law (i.e., without trial) for violations of the Indiana securities laws by the corporation. While this in itself is not groundbreaking, the facts underlying the case are rather startling.

 

This ruling has emphasized that directors and officers can be personally liable for a corporation's violations of the Indiana securities laws (and the similar securities laws of other states) under some circumstances. A director could have a defense against personal liability if the director did not know, and in the exercise of "reasonable care" could not have known, of the facts giving rise to the violation. In Lean v. Reed, the court found that the elected director had per se failed to use reasonable care because he assumed, without inquiry, that management had taken the steps required to comply with the Indiana securities laws in connection with a share exchange transaction approved at his first board meeting.

 

The Lean v. Reed decision could be read as imposing a burden under certain circumstances on directors to inquire into the company's securities law compliance, an area of law often understood by only securities attorneys, whenever the corporation issues securities.  Although it is not clear what will be sufficient to establish the use of reasonable care, we do know that you might be held not to have used reasonable care if you do not at least ask. Directors (and officers and partners and managers and others in similar situations) shouldn't assume that they will have no liability under state securities laws for securities transactions completed by their companies simply because they may act in good faith.

Comments for Are You Sure You Want to be a Director?

Leave a comment





Captcha